KC Voices: The smoke and mirrors around government funding and Kansas’ Amendment 2

Register to vote by July 12, and vote on or by August 2.
Screen Shot 2022 07 03 At 102932 Pm

Women’s reproductive rights protest at the Plaza June 24, 2022. // Photo by Angela Bond

We’ve been asking members of the KC community to submit stories about their thoughts and experiences in all walks of life. If you’ve got a story you’d like to share with our readers, please send it to brock@thepitchkc.com for consideration. Today, former lawyer and current KU law teacher Amii Castle weighs in on disinformation around the upcoming Amendment 2 vote in Kansas.

KC Voices local submissions

Illustration by Jack Raybuck

KC Voices local submissions


On August 2, you’ll be voting whether to amend our Kansas state constitution to take away the right to access abortion, in all cases, including rape, incest, and to save the life of a pregnant woman.

The proposed amendment reads in pertinent part:

“The Value Them Both Amendment would affirm there is no Kansas constitutional right to abortion or to require the government funding of abortion, and would reserve to the people of Kansas, through their elected state legislators, the right to pass laws to regulate abortion, including, but not limited to, in circumstances of pregnancy resulting from rape or incest, or when necessary to save the life of the mother.”

But you can read the full text of the document here.

In perhaps an obvious statement, the language of the proposed amendment is confusing. Some who read the amendment might think they are voting to ban abortions except in cases of rape, incest, or to save the life of the mother. But it’s the opposite. The amendment would give power to the Republican-led legislature to ban abortion in all cases, including in cases of rape, incest, or to save the life of the mother.

It is my belief that those Topeka politicians will do just that.

Unfortunately, the misinformation from those in the “Vote Yes” camp—those who want to ban abortions in Kansas—is astounding. Take, for example, the claim that the two purposes of the proposed amendment are 1) to prohibit late-term abortions and 2) to prohibit government funding of abortion care. Sounds reasonable, right? But these claims are disingenuous, at best.  

Late-term abortions—abortions after twenty-two weeks of pregnancy—are not performed in Kansas and are already outlawed, except in cases of probable death or injury to women. This is spelled out in K.S.A. § 65-6703.

Indeed, according to the Kansas Department of Health and Environment, the agency tasked with keeping track of abortions performed in Kansas, there were no abortions performed in Kansas after twenty-two (22) weeks of pregnancy in 2021.

Not one. 

In fact, only one late-term abortion has been performed in Kansas since 2015. And if the purpose of proposing the amendment was to ban late-term abortions, then why aren’t late-term abortions included in the language of the proposed amendment? 

Similarly, government funding of abortion care is also already outlawed.

K.S.A. § 65-6733 (outlaws state funding for abortion); K.S.A. § 65-6736 (outlaws state or municipal funding for abortion); K.S.A. § 65-6734 (outlaws K-12 school contractors from providing abortion services or abortion information); and K.S.A. § 76-3308 (outlaws abortion procedures at K.U. Medical facilities). The only exception is if an abortion is necessary to save the life of the pregnant person as defined in K.S.A. § 65-6738.

Claiming that we need this amendment to ban government funding of abortions is smoke and mirrors. It’s disingenuous to misrepresent the current state of the law in Kansas on late-term abortions and government funding to get folks to vote yes, when both are already illegal. In terms of educating the electorate, this is nothing but smoke and mirrors.

Register to vote by July 12, and vote on or by August 2. A “no” vote defeats the amendment, a “yes” vote passes the amendment.

Categories: Politics